{"id":1012,"date":"2012-03-29T13:36:19","date_gmt":"2012-03-29T13:36:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/2012\/03\/29\/open-letter-to-uncsd-secretary-general\/"},"modified":"2012-03-29T13:36:19","modified_gmt":"2012-03-29T13:36:19","slug":"open-letter-to-uncsd-secretary-general","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/open-letter-to-uncsd-secretary-general\/","title":{"rendered":"Open Letter to the Secretary General of the UNCSD"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Co-Chairs of the Bureau for Rio+20 and Member-States of the United Nations<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; text-align: center;\">RIGHTS AT RISK AT THE UNITED NATIONS<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">We  \u2013 the civil society organizations and social movements who have  responded to the call of the United Nations General Assembly to  participate in the Rio+20 process \u2013 feel that is our duty to call the  attention of relevant authorities and citizens of the world to a  situation that severely threatens the rights of all people and  undermines the relevance of the United Nations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Remarkably,  we are witnessing an attempt by certain countries to weaken, or  &#8220;bracket&#8221; or outright eliminate nearly all references to human rights  obligations and equity principles in the text, &#8220;The Future We Want&#8221;, for  the outcome of Rio+20.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">This  includes references to the right to food and proper nutrition, the  right to safe and clean drinking water and sanitation, the right to  development and others.  The right to a clean and healthy environment,  which is essential to the realization of fundamental human rights,  remains weak in the text.  Even principles previously agreed upon in Rio  in 1992 are being bracketed \u2013 the Polluter Pays Principle,  Precautionary Principle, Common But Differentiated Responsibility  (CBDR).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Many  member states are opposing prescriptive language that commits  governments to actually do what they claim to support in principle and  act as duty bearers of human rights, including the provision of finance,  technology and other means of implementation to support sustainable  development effort in developing countries.  On the other hand, there is  a strong push for private sector investments and initiatives to fill in  the gap left by the public sector.  This risks privatizing and  commoditizing common goods \u2013 such as water \u2013 which in turn endangers  access and affordability, which are fundamental to such rights.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Although  economic tools are essential to implement the decisions aiming for  sustainability, social justice and peace, a private economy rationale  should not prevail over the fulfillment of human needs and the respect  of planetary boundaries. Therefore a strong institutional framework and  regulation is needed. Weakly regulated markets have already proven to be  a threat not only to people and nature, but to economies and nation  states themselves. Markets must work for people, people should not work  for markets.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">From  the ashes of World War II humanity gathered to build institutions  aiming to build peace and prosperity for all, avoiding further suffering  and destruction. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights spells out  this collective will, and the United Nations organization was created to  make it a reality. Alarmingly, this very institution is now being used  as a platform to attack the very rights it should safeguard, leaving  people without defense and putting the very relevance of the UN at  stake.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">We  urge member states to bring the Rio+20 negotiations back on track to  deliver the people&#8217;s legitimate agenda and the realization of rights,  democracy and sustainability, as well as respect for transparency,  accountability and non-regression on progress made.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">We  call on the UN Secretary General to stand up for the legacy of the  United Nations by ensuring that Rio+20 builds on the multi-generational  effort to strengthen rights as the foundation of peace and prosperity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">We  urge our fellow citizens of the world to stand up for the future we  want, and let their voices be heard.  To that end the Rio+20 process  should be improved by adopting the proposals we submit below.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">On Greater participation for MGs<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">We  are concerned by the continuing exclusion of Major Groups from the  formal negotiating process of the Rio+20 zero draft.  Unlike in the  Preparatory Committee Meetings and the Intersessional Meetings, Major  Groups and other Stakeholders have not been allowed to present revisions  or make statements on the floor of the meeting.  Nor, we suspect will  we be allowed to make submissions or participate fully in the working  negotiation group meetings that are likely to follow.  Despite the UN  DESA having compiled a text that shows all the revisions suggested by  Major Groups, these revisions to the zero draft have so far not been  included in the official negotiating text.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">We  request that the Major Groups be given the opportunity to submit  suggestions and wording which would then be added to the official text  for consideration, indication of support or deletion, and potential  inclusion by governments.<br \/>We  appeal to the UNCSD Secretary General to urgently reverse this state of  affairs and to ensure that Major Groups have a seat at the table and a  voice in the room where the negotiations are taking place.  Please  ensure that at the very least, Major Groups are allowed a formal  statement at the commencement of the next negotiating session and at  every session where a new draft text is introduced.#<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">SIGNED:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Ibon International<br \/>Vitae Civilis<br \/>The Access Initiative<br \/>Stakeholder Forum<br \/>Council of Canadians<br \/>Consumers International<br \/>Sustain Labour<br \/>International Trade Union Confederation<br \/>CIVICUS<br \/>Women in Europe for a Common Future<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">To download the letter, click <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stakeholderforum.org\/fileadmin\/files\/Rights at Risk in Rio.for sign-on.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Co-Chairs of the Bureau for Rio+20 and Member-States of the United Nations RIGHTS AT RISK AT THE UNITED NATIONS We \u2013 the civil society organizations and social movements who have responded to the call&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1012","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1012","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1012"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1012\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}