{"id":840,"date":"2011-10-31T15:28:07","date_gmt":"2011-10-31T15:28:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/2011\/10\/31\/zero-draft-european-population-alliance\/"},"modified":"2011-10-31T15:28:07","modified_gmt":"2011-10-31T15:28:07","slug":"zero-draft-european-population-alliance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/zero-draft-european-population-alliance\/","title":{"rendered":"European Population Alliance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Population Growth: the Neglected \u2018Green\u2019 Issue <\/p>\n<p>A Text for Rio+20 <\/p>\n<p>\u201cPopulation stabilization should be a priority for sustainable  development\u201d: Kofi Annan, former UN Secretary-General. (Key  Recommendation of GHF 2009).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEither we reduce our numbers voluntarily, or nature will do it for us  brutally\u201d: Maurice Strong, Secretary-General first Earth Summit, Rio,  1992.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s no use reducing your footprint if you keep increasing the number of feet\u201d: popular saying.  <\/p>\n<p>1. Population Growth as a Multiplier of all Other Environmental  Problems:   Each additional person: needs more food, water, energy, land, timber and  minerals; and produces more waste, CO2 and pollution; the rich  consuming and polluting more than the poor. Thus rising populations:  increase soil exhaustion, erosion, desertification, habitat destruction,  deforestation, aquifer depletion, CO2 emissions, sea level rise,  climate change and chemical pollution; and reduce the finite and  dwindling natural resources available per person, increasing long term  poverty. Thus all environmental, and most economic problems become  harder, and ultimately impossible, to solve with ever more people.  Population stabilisation is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition  for sustainability. <\/p>\n<p>2. The \u2018Sustainable Development Goal\u2019: <br \/> Impact (on the environment) = Population x Affluence (resource  consumption) x Technology \u2013 the \u2018IPAT function. Thus long-term  biophysical sustainability requires: improved technology, giving greater  resource efficiency; and reduced resource-consumption by the rich; and  stable or reducing populations. Smaller populations can sustainably  consume more resources per person than larger ones, while remaining  within the biophysical limits of a finite planet; and indefinite growth  being physically impossible, it is certain that population growth will  end in any case at some point, either (preferably) sooner by fewer  births, or later by more deaths, overwhelming any attempt at a \u2018Green  Economy\u2019.   <\/p>\n<p>3. Population Growth as a Variable, not a \u2018Given\u2019:<br \/> As the global population passes 7 billion in 2011, its growth (at 80  million per year, 10,000 per hour) is clearly a driver of all the new  and emerging challenges. The UN now project the population for 2050  between 8.1 and 10.6 billion \u2013 a range of 2.5 billion, or the Earth\u2019s  entire population in 1950.  Clearly sustainable prosperity will be far  easier to achieve, the nearer to 8.1 bn the population stabilizes. This  will need priority, and resources: in developing countries for  non-coercive family planning and women\u2019s education and empowerment  programmes; in developed countries for public information programmes,  aiming to balance reproductive rights with social and environmental  responsibilities to current and future generations.   <\/p>\n<p>4. Resources for Family Planning: <br \/> There are currently 215 million women (and rising) with an unmet need  for family planning (FP). Total world aid for FP is only 10% of the  Goldman Sachs bonus pot \u2013 a derisory figure. Priority for FP is low,  partly because the \u2018population\u2019 problem has in recent years been  marginalised as one largely of sexual and reproductive health and  women\u2019s rights; whereas in reality it affects the long-term prospects of  success for all programmes across all Departments. Some 40% of all  pregnancies world-wide remain unintended. <\/p>\n<p>5.  Action at Rio+20 &#8211; a draft Text:<br \/> Ignoring the population multiplier guarantees ultimate failure for all  sustainable development initiatives, since rising populations would  overwhelm any development gains. To address this, the following draft  text is proposed:  <\/p>\n<p>[The Conference] <br \/> Recognises: that all population growth, especially in developed  countries, increases impacts on the environment, and reduces the natural  resources available per person; that population stabilization in all  countries is therefore a necessary condition of biophysical  sustainability; that prospects for sustainable development will thus  improve, the sooner population can be stabilized within ecologically  sustainable limits; and that this can best be achieved by non-coercive  population stabilization\/reduction policies in all countries, comprising  the provision of family planning and women\u2019s education and empowerment  programmes to meet all unmet need for contraception, and the promotion  of a cultural shift in favour of smaller families; <\/p>\n<p>Calls on: <br \/> All Governments to give priority to the introduction, promotion and resourcing of such programmes; <br \/> All Governments to implement a programme of assessment and evaluation,  both of their resources relevant to the well-being of their people, and  of the impact of population growth on it;<br \/> Donor countries to give priority to support of these programmes.<\/p>\n<p>To read the full submission document click <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stakeholderforum.org\/fileadmin\/files\/EuropeanPopulationAlliance.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Population Growth: the Neglected \u2018Green\u2019 Issue A Text for Rio+20 \u201cPopulation stabilization should be a priority for sustainable development\u201d: Kofi Annan, former UN Secretary-General. (Key Recommendation of GHF 2009). \u201cEither we reduce our numbers&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[120],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-zero-draft-mgs"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=840"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/840\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}