{"id":847,"date":"2011-10-31T15:44:54","date_gmt":"2011-10-31T15:44:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/2011\/10\/31\/zero-draft-forest-stewardship-council\/"},"modified":"2011-10-31T15:44:54","modified_gmt":"2011-10-31T15:44:54","slug":"zero-draft-forest-stewardship-council","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/zero-draft-forest-stewardship-council\/","title":{"rendered":"Forest Stewardship Council"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Contribution Forest Stewardship Council to outcomes of the Rio+20 Conference<\/p>\n<p> In particular on &#8220;green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>Oaxaca\/Mexico, Bonn\/Germany, 27 September, 2011<\/p>\n<p>Context<\/p>\n<p>The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) underlines key messages from UNEP in its Green Economy report of 20111: &#8220;Forests are a foundation of the green economy, sustaining a wide range of sectors and liveli-hoods&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Short-term liquidation of forest assets for limited private gains threatens this foundation, and needs to be halted&#8221;. <\/p>\n<p>FSC agrees with UNEP in setting as objectives of a green economy:  &#8220;mproved human well-being and social equity, while significantly  reducing environmental risks and ecological scarci-ties&#8221;.This clarifies  that economic activities need to respect ecological constraints but have  clear social objectives. <\/p>\n<p>FSC works in conjunction with and complements initiatives that aim to  reduce deforestation and forest degradation globally and increase the  total forest cover, also as part of climate miti-gation and adaptation  policies.   <\/p>\n<p>The urgency for responsible forest management is compelled by increased  demand for forest products to sustain fundamental needs such as  providing energy source, construction mate-rial, and other purposes.   <\/p>\n<p>UNEP describes certification of sustainable forest management, such as  FSC, as a promising development, a relevant contribution to shift the  trends. However, it needs to be applied at a much greater scope, in  particular in the tropical and sub-tropical areas. It concludes that  &#8220;There are reasons for optimism, but greening the forest sector requires  a sustained effort. Various standards and certification schemes have  provided a sound basis for practising sustainable forest management, but  their widespread uptake requires a strong mandate and consistent  policies and markets. <\/p>\n<p>As Party to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the majority of UN  governments have, in Nagoya last year, committed themselves to the  &#8220;Aichi Biodiversity Targets&#8221; for 2020. These include the aim to halve  the (annual) rates of losses of forests, &#8220;and where feasible brought  close to zero&#8221;, and to significantly reduce degradation and  fragmentation. Sustainably managed forests will also contribute to  &#8220;ensuring conservation of biodiversity&#8221;, as well as the restoration of 15% of currently degraded ecosystems. The Parties have committed  themselves to develop or update, by 2015, national biodiversity  strategies and action plans to help implementing the Aichi targets.<\/p>\n<p> FSC calls for inclusion of a &#8220;Certification Support Pledge&#8221; in the outcomes of the Rio+20 Conference, with the following text:   <\/p>\n<p>Governments recognise that forests are a foundation of the green  economy, sustaining a wide range of sectors and livelihoods; that forests also form an essential  part of the world\u0081fs ecosystems and play a crucial role in mitigation  of, and adaption to, climate change. They are alarmed about the ongoing  deforestation and forest degradation in many parts of the world. They  are aware of the increased demand for forest products and the  opportunities and threats this will create. Responsible forest  management therefore is essential to protect environment, biodiversity and ecosystem services, ensure the respect of social and  human rights, guarantee proper wages and prosperity and contribute  appropriately to the domestic economies. Forest certification is  complementary to nature conservation and provides a promising  environmental, social and economic alternative to practices that result  in destructive forest exploitation and deforestation.   Therefore, all governments taking part in the Rio+20 Conference, pledge  concrete and systematic support and promotion of transparent, effective, balanced multi  stakeholder governed forest and chain-of-custody certification systems,  in all parts of the world, with special attention to tropical and  sub-tropical rainforests. They do this in line with their individual  responsibilities and possibilities, towards their domestic forests, as  actors on the public procurement markets, as guardians of internal  markets, as decisionmakers on consumer information criteria, and as initiators and supporters of development and training assistance at home  and\/or abroad. They recognise that forest certification can strengthen  local economies, ensure the rights and interests of indigenous peoples  and local communities and avoid the destruction of forests, their  ecosystem services and their biodiversity, and, drive continuous  improvements, provided it is based on robust principles, applied through  transparent and balanced participatory, multi-stakeholder governed,  processes, and includes independent, on-the-ground, monitoring,  re-porting and verification.   Governments engaged in Rio+20 commit to include support for credible  forest certification in their national biodiversity strategies and  action plans as well as in other plans focused on limit-ing or reducing  the ecological footprint of their societies, including integrated  product pro-curement policies.   <\/p>\n<p>They will furthermore support the success of such forest certification  systems by aligning pub-lic procurement practices at all levels with  certified forest products and services, as well as promote certified  products with their citizens.   <\/p>\n<p>Those governments engaged in development cooperation with other  countries, commit to in-clude forest certification in their programmes,  supporting the development of forest dependent local economies, social  rights, and environmentally sound forest management. <\/p>\n<p>Government activities to implement this pledge could include:   <\/p>\n<p>On the ground: develop and enforce appropriate policies and regulations  for responsible for-est management and guarantee efficient and effective  controls; create favourable conditions for robust and balanced  multi-stakeholder based forest certification schemes such as FSC  (examples existing in South Africa, Brazil, Guatemala), including tax  incentives for certificate holders (such as in Peru).   <\/p>\n<p>On the ground: support responsible forest management practice through  education and training; support development of curricula to help people  understanding the values of healthy forests and green economy; and .  where appropriate &#8211; for training to understand processes of voluntary  certification based on participatory processes. On the ground: where forests are public, seek FSC certification of these  forests and demon-strate responsible management including stakeholder  engagement.   <\/p>\n<p>On the ground: actively support and encourage FSC oriented  multi-stakeholder decision making processes to achieve FSC Forest  Management certification of private and community forests.<\/p>\n<p>On the ground in other countries: promote and support assistance to  forest management certification processes by social development  organisations, in particular in the tropical and subtropical countries. <\/p>\n<p>On the markets: inform and mobilise consumers to differentiate between  products based on social and environmental impact, and to understand  that forest products from questionable origin contribute to  irresponsible forest management practises such as overharvesting,  degra-dation, illegal activities, and violation of worker and human  rights. Give confidence by identify-ing credible certification schemes  that deserve consumer preference in public procurement policies.   <\/p>\n<p>On the markets: practice green public procurement, in a credible manner,  and support a large, reliable market for certified products, including  by setting progressive targets. On the FSC website we will present progressively examples of supporting  activities govern-ments have already been engaged in, in particular  in\/for tropical and semi-tropical forests  (http:\/\/www.fsc.org\/casestudies.html). What is FSC: <\/p>\n<p>The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is an independent,  non\u0081]governmental, not for profit organization established to promote  the responsible management of the world\u0081fs forests. FSC is a unique  forum where stakeholders from around the world meet and through strong  multi-stakeholder processes define essential social and environmental  criteria for forest manage-ment. These fundamental principles are  realized in forests worldwide through FSC certifica-tion. Through  programs, services and solutions that support FSC certification, the  Forest Stewardship Council empowers organizations, businesses and  communities to support forest management that meets the social, economic  and ecological needs of present and future generations.<\/p>\n<p>Find more  information at www.fsc.org<\/p>\n<p>To read the full submission document click <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stakeholderforum.org\/fileadmin\/files\/ForestStewardshipCouncil.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Contribution Forest Stewardship Council to outcomes of the Rio+20 Conference In particular on &#8220;green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication&#8221; Oaxaca\/Mexico, Bonn\/Germany, 27 September, 2011 Context The Forest Stewardship Council&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[120],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-847","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-zero-draft-mgs"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/847","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=847"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/847\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=847"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=847"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}