{"id":950,"date":"2012-02-07T12:06:30","date_gmt":"2012-02-07T12:06:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/2012\/02\/07\/zero-draft-document-for-rio20-labelled-as-lacking-ambition-and-balance\/"},"modified":"2012-02-07T12:06:30","modified_gmt":"2012-02-07T12:06:30","slug":"zero-draft-document-for-rio20-labelled-as-lacking-ambition-and-balance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/zero-draft-document-for-rio20-labelled-as-lacking-ambition-and-balance\/","title":{"rendered":"Zero Draft Document for Rio+20 labelled as lacking ambition and balance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Following the release of the zero draft  document for the Rio+20 conference, to take place in June 2012, the  first round of informal negotiations was held on 25-27 January. Many  participants called for a stronger focus on poverty eradication and  gender issues in revisions of the summit\u2019s outcome document. <\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">The zero draft document was generally  labelled as lacking ambition and balance, with environmental aspects  said to be dominating the agenda. Strong emphasis was given by  participants for the need to strengthen the social and economic  dimensions of sustainable development; some stressed in this regard the  need to involve a wider range of ministries, such as finance, health,  agriculture and trade in the discussions. \u201cIntegrating the three pillars  in a balanced manner is something we will need to address and reconcile  in Rio if we truly want to achieve sustainable development and  eradicate poverty\u201d, a participant said during the meeting.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">According to the Group of 77 developing  countries at the UN (G-77), the document did not sufficiently draw on  the concerns and positions of the group and China and failed to address  financial regulations as well as unsustainable patterns of consumption.  In order to build on the commitments agreed at previous summits, \u201cthe  outcome document needs to produce an assessment and stocktaking as to  why many of the commitments were not realized to their full potential\u201d,  their statement reads.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">During the meeting, representatives of  the United States pointed to the discussion\u2019s domination by issues  addressing the North-South divide. With differences diminishing rapidly  the focus should rather be on partnership, inclusion and cooperation,  they said. The EU, in the same spirit, emphasized the importance to take  into account \u201cthe changes in the global economy, and the emergence of  some developing countries as major economic actors on the global stage\u201d.  This was widely seen by many as a move by developed countries to  re-interpret or even reject the principle of Common but Differentiated  Response (CBRD) \u2014 one of the key principles adopted at the Rio1992  conference, as was the case at the climate conference in Durban;. The  group of G77 and China, however, indicated that the outcome document  \u201cwill not renegotiate nor retract agreed outcomes of the major summits  and agreed principles, including the principle of common but  differentiated responsibilities\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">The importance of addressing gender  issues in an integrated rather than exclusive manner was an ambition  mentioned by a considerable number of participants during the meeting.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">The proposal to introduce sustainable  development goals (SDGs), put forward by Colombia and Guatemala,  gathered further interest during the discussions. In response to  concerns that the SDGs may replace the Millennium Development Goals  (MDGs), the proponents emphasised that they would complement and build  on the MDGs, while being universally applied.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">With a common definition of the green  economy not yet agreed upon, participants voiced their hope that further  agreement would be achieved at the next informal meeting in March. The  meeting is to focus on the two main themes of Rio+20 \u2014 the institutional  framework for sustainable development (IFSD) as well as a green economy  in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><em>Article originally published at <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.eurostep.org\/wcm\/eurostep-weekly\/1915-zero-draft-document-for-rio20-labelled-as-lacking-ambition-and-balance.html\" rel=\"noopener\">www.eurostep.org<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following the release of the zero draft document for the Rio+20 conference, to take place in June 2012, the first round of informal negotiations was held on 25-27 January. Many participants called for a&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-950","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=950"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/950\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsummit2012.stakeholderforum.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}